CS374: Principles of Programming Languages - Finite Automata (100 Points)
Assignment Goals
The goals of this assignment are:- To map the control flow of a program using finite automata
The Assignment
The purpose of this assignment is to create and implement a finite automata in a computer program.
Part 1: Defining the Finite Automata
Consider the language S = {0, 1}, L = { w = strings of S* such that count(0) % 2 == 1 and count(1) % 2 == 1 }. In other words, there are an odd number of 0 and 1 characters in a String consisting of 1 and 0 characters of arbitrary length.
We can construct a finite state machine (FSM) from this definition. Specifically, we’ll use a Deterministic Finite Automata (DFA), although Non-Deterministic Fintie Automata (NFA) and regular expressions all recognize the same class of languages (“regular languages”).
Go to the FSM Simulator and define your state machine for the language above. Your accepting state will be the condition in which you know there are an odd number of 0 characters and an odd number of 1 characters. Paste your resulting DFA into your readme document, or otherwise save and include it with your submission.
Part 2: Implementing the Finite Automata
Write a program in a language of your choice that reads one character at a time from the terminal. Do not keep track of the actual number of characters that you have read, nor how many of each character you have seen (finite state machines only store their current state, with no additional information!). Instead, keep a variable that is equal to the state number that you are in. You can use an if statement that checks whether each character is a 0 or a 1, and a nested if statement that checks which state you’re in now. The result of these conditionals should be to update the state number to another state. When you’re done reading the string from the console, print out whether or not you are in an accepting state at the end.
Part 3: Practice Constructing Finite State Machines
Using the FSM Simulator, construct some new finite state machines, which you can save and include with your submission. For each finite state machine, assume a language L consisting of Strings over S* given the alphabet S = {0, 1}.
- All strings in which the character 0 always appears in pairs. For example:
100111001but not1010010. The regular expression is:(1*(00)*1*)*. - All strings in which the count of the character 1 is a multiple of 3. For example:
1001001but not100100. The regular expression is(0*10*10*1)*.
Part 4: Limitations of Finite Automata
In your readme, describe why it is not possible to define a finite automata to balance parenthesis? Hint: it has to do with the fact that the FSM can’t store additional state, as we saw in Part 2! This is the same reason why you cannot represent this language with a regular expression.
Design Questions to Help You Begin
Please answer the following questions in your README file before you begin writing your program.- What states would represent each of the conditions in Part 1? Hint: there are four of them - how many combinations of even/odd can you have for each character in the alphabet?
Submission
In your submission, please include answers to any questions asked on the assignment page, as well as the questions listed below, in your README file. If you wrote code as part of this assignment, please describe your design, approach, and implementation in a separate document prepared using a word processor or typesetting program such as LaTeX. This document should include specific instructions on how to build and run your code, and a description of each code module or function that you created suitable for re-use by a colleague. In your README, please include answers to the following questions:- Describe what you did, how you did it, what challenges you encountered, and how you solved them.
- Please answer any questions found throughout the narrative of this assignment.
- If collaboration with a buddy was permitted, did you work with a buddy on this assignment? If so, who? If not, do you certify that this submission represents your own original work?
- Please identify any and all portions of your submission that were not originally written by you (for example, code originally written by your buddy, or anything taken or adapted from a non-classroom resource). It is always OK to use your textbook and instructor notes; however, you are certifying that any portions not designated as coming from an outside person or source are your own original work.
- Approximately how many hours it took you to finish this assignment (I will not judge you for this at all...I am simply using it to gauge if the assignments are too easy or hard)?
- Your overall impression of the assignment. Did you love it, hate it, or were you neutral? One word answers are fine, but if you have any suggestions for the future let me know.
- Using the grading specifications on this page, discuss briefly the grade you would give yourself and why. Discuss each item in the grading specification.
- Any other concerns that you have. For instance, if you have a bug that you were unable to solve but you made progress, write that here. The more you articulate the problem the more partial credit you will receive (it is fine to leave this blank).
Assignment Rubric
| Description | Pre-Emerging (< 50%) | Beginning (50%) | Progressing (85%) | Proficient (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algorithm Implementation (60%) | The algorithm fails on the test inputs due to major issues, or the program fails to compile and/or run | The algorithm fails on the test inputs due to one or more minor issues | The algorithm is implemented to solve the problem correctly according to given test inputs, but would fail if executed in a general case due to a minor issue or omission in the algorithm design or implementation | A reasonable algorithm is implemented to solve the problem which correctly solves the problem according to the given test inputs, and would be reasonably expected to solve the problem in the general case |
| Code Quality and Documentation (30%) | Code commenting and structure are absent, or code structure departs significantly from best practice, and/or the code departs significantly from the style guide | Code commenting and structure is limited in ways that reduce the readability of the program, and/or there are minor departures from the style guide | Code documentation is present that re-states the explicit code definitions, and/or code is written that mostly adheres to the style guide | Code is documented at non-trivial points in a manner that enhances the readability of the program, and code is written according to the style guide |
| Writeup and Submission (10%) | An incomplete submission is provided | The program is submitted, but not according to the directions in one or more ways (for example, because it is lacking a readme writeup) | The program is submitted according to the directions with a minor omission or correction needed, and with at least superficial responses to the bolded questions throughout | The program is submitted according to the directions, including a readme writeup describing the solution, and thoughtful answers to the bolded questions throughout |
Please refer to the Style Guide for code quality examples and guidelines.